The Canterbury Tales – Art of Characterization


The Canterbury Tales – Art of Characterization

The Canterbury Tales - Art of Characterization

The Canterbury Tales – Art of Characterization


Geoffrey Chaucer’s “The Canterbury Tales” stands as a foundational work in English literature, featuring a varied assembly of characters embarking on a pilgrimage to Canterbury. Chaucer’s adept storytelling unfolds through vivid characterizations, where each pilgrim serves as a distinctive representation of medieval society. The art of characterization in “The Canterbury Tales” underscores Chaucer’s prowess in delineating a broad spectrum of personalities, providing a comprehensive panorama of human nature within a well-structured narrative. Let’s explore Chaucer’s art of characterization in ‘The Canterbury Tales’ in detail.

Diverse and Multifaceted Characters:

Chaucer’s characters in “The Canterbury Tales” exhibit remarkable diversity and complexity. Spanning from the devout to the licentious, the aristocratic to the humble, the pilgrims encompass a broad range of societal roles, reflecting various social classes, professions, and moral perspectives. This diversity enables Chaucer to delve into and critique different facets of medieval society.

Social Commentary and Satire:

Each character embodies distinct traits, providing Chaucer with a platform for social commentary and satire. Through their interactions and narratives, he presents a satirical perspective on societal norms, laying bare human shortcomings, contradictions, and the intricate nuances of morality. Characters like the Wife of Bath, the Pardoner, the Miller, and the Knight exemplify this satirical exploration.

Use of Indirect Characterization:

Chaucer often employs indirect methods for characterization, allowing characters to reveal themselves through their actions, speeches, and tales. He refrains from explicit character descriptions, relying on the characters’ words and deeds to construct a vibrant picture of their personalities, morals, and beliefs.

Stereotypes vs. Complexity:

While some characters may initially appear as stereotypes, Chaucer frequently complicates these portrayals. Characters like the Pardoner or the Wife of Bath, who might seem like conventional figures at first glance, unveil layers of complexity and depth, challenging simplistic categorizations.

Realism and Individuality:

Chaucer’s characters exude a sense of realism and individuality, rendering them relatable and authentic despite their exaggerated traits. Their unique voices, personal anecdotes, and conflicting viewpoints contribute to a lively and authentic portrayal of human nature.

Function within the Framed Narrative:

Each character’s tale serves not only as entertainment but also carries significance within the overarching narrative. These tales often mirror or contrast with the character’s persona, unveiling deeper layers of their personalities and beliefs.


Chaucer’s “The Canterbury Tales” stands as a testament to his unparalleled skill in characterization, presenting a rich tapestry of diverse, multifaceted, and authentic individuals. Through these characters, Chaucer engages in a subtle yet incisive critique of medieval society, providing a timeless portrayal of human nature and societal dynamics. 0 0 0.

Some Critical Aritlces on Literature:

  1. H Derozio | To the Pupils of Hindu College | Critical Study
  2. Toru Dutt’s Poetry-Chief Characteristics
  3. Robert Southey | The Scholar | Analytical Study
  4. Henry Derozio | Song of the Hindustanee Minstrel | Critical Study
  5. Henry Derozio | Chorus of Brahmins | Critical Study
  6. John Dryden | Mac Flecknoe as Mock-heroic Poem
  7. Kamala Das | A Losing Battle | Analytical Study
  8. The Mahabharata by Vyasa-A Review
  9. Medieval Romance Chief Characteristics
  10. Old English Language-Key Features
  11. Birth and Development of Arabic Prose
  12. Modern English: Chief Characteristics
  13. Birth and Evolution of Arabic Poetry
  14. John Donne’s Poetry | Chief Characteristics
Previous articleLost Star by Rabindranath Tagore: An Analysis
Next articleMurder in the Cathedral – Historical Background